Skip to main content
Log in

Safety first: significant risk of air embolism in laparoscopic gasketless insufflation systems

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Gasketless laparoscopic insufflator systems are marketed for the ability to prevent desufflation of pneumoperitoneum during laparoscopy. However, surgeons raised concern for possible introduction of non-absorbable room air, including oxygen (O2), with these systems. A community-university collaborative was created to test this hypothesis.

Methods

An artificial abdomen, calibrated to equivalent compliance and volume of an average abdomen, was connected to a flow meter, oxygen concentration sensor, and commercially available laparoscopic gasketless cannula system. A commercially available gasketed cannula system was utilized as a control. Intra-abdominal concentration of oxygen was measured at 0–60 L per minute (L/min) of insufflated carbon dioxide (CO2) aspiration, as would occur during laparoscopic suctioning. For reference, a 5-mm laparoscopic suction device has an aspiration rate of approx. 42 L per minute. At the test facility, room air was 20.5% O2 at 50% humidity. Descriptive and univariate statistics were calculated with p < 0.05 considered significant.

Results

At 0 L/min CO2 aspiration, there was minimal (< 0.5%) oxygen detected intra-abdominally. However, with increasing rates of aspiration of pneumoperitoneum, increasing amounts of room air were detected intraabdominally in the gasketless versus gasketed cannula systems (mean ± standard deviation): 14.7 ± 1.2% versus 1.2 ± 0.5%, p < 0.0001 at 5 L/min aspiration, 18.1 ± 0.69% versus 1.1 ± 0.02%, p < 0.0001 at 10 L/min, 50.4 ± 2.19% vs 1.01 ± 0.003%, p < 0.0001 at 20 L/min. Above 25 L/min aspiration, the standard gasketed cannula systems experienced desufflation, but the gasketless system continued to entrain air to maintain insufflation: 64% room air at 30 L/min aspiration, 71% at 40 L/min aspiration, 77% at 50 L/min aspiration, and 84% at 60 L/min aspiration.

Conclusions

Gasketless cannula insufflation systems maintain abdominal insufflation by entraining non-medical room air. Especially at high aspiration rates, the majority of absorbable CO2 was replaced by non-medical room air, increasing potential for gas embolism with poorly absorbed oxygen and nitrogen. Authors have reported these experimental findings to the FDA and companies marketing these devices.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hong J, Kim W, Kil H (2010) Detection of subclinical CO2 embolism by transesophageal echocardiography during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Urology 75:581–584

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Burcharth J, Burgdorf S, Lolle I, Rosenberg J (2012) Successful resuscitation after carbon dioxide embolism during laparoscopy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 22:164–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Sharma KC, Kabinoff G, Ducheine Y, Tierney J, Brandstetter RD (1997) Laparoscopic surgery and its potential for medical complications. Hear Lung J Acute Crit Care 26:52–67

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Richter S, Matthes C, Ploenes T, Aksakal D, Wowra T, Hückstädt T, Schier F, Kampmann C (2013) Air in the insufflation tube may cause fatal embolizations in laparoscopic surgery: an animal study. Surg Endosc Other Interv Tech 27:1791–1797

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Toung TJK, Rossberg M, Hutchins G (2016) Volume of air in a lethal venous air embolism. Anesthesiology 94:360–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Menes T, Spivak H (2000) Laparoscopy: searching for the proper insufflation gas. Surg Endosc 14:1050–1056

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Mirski MA, Lele AV, Fitzsimmons L, Toung TJ, Warltier DC, Mirski MA, Lele AV (2007) Diagnosis and treatment of vascular air embolism. Anesthesiology 106:164–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Park EY, Kwon JY, Kim KJ (2012) Carbon dioxide embolism during laparoscopic surgery. Yonsei Med J 53:459–466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Fors D, Eiriksson K, Arvidsson D, Rubertsson S (2010) Gas embolism during laparoscopic liver resection in a pig model: frequency and severity. Br J Anaesth 105:282–288

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Otsuka Y, Katagiri T, Ishii J, Maeda T, Kubota Y, Tamura A, Tsuchiya M, Kaneko H (2013) Gas embolism in laparoscopic hepatectomy: what is the optimal pneumoperitoneal pressure for laparoscopic major hepatectomy? J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 20:137–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Schmandra TC, Mierdl S, Bauer H, Gutt C, Hanisch E (2002) Transoesophageal echocardiography shows high risk of gas embolism during laparoscopic hepatic resection under carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum. Br J Surg 89:870–876

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Kobayashi S, Honda G, Kurata M, Tadano S, Sakamoto K, Okuda Y, Abe K (2016) An experimental study on the relationship among airway pressure, pneumoperitoneum pressure, and central venous pressure in pure laparoscopic hepatectomy. Ann Surg 263:1159–1163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Emilie Herrmann MD, Schaeffer-Reiss C, Clémentine PhD, Venot MD, Noll E, Girish MD, Joshi P, Pierre MBA,MD, Diemunsch A, PD MD (2017) CO2 pneumoperitoneum contamination with air during laparoscopic surgery: valveless versus conventional insufflation systems. Annu Meet Am Soc Anesthesiol 126:1425–1426

    Google Scholar 

  14. Muth CM, Shank ES (2000) Gas embolism. N Engl J Med 342:476–482

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Hagen PT, Scholz DG, Edwards WD (1984) Incidence and size of patent foramen ovale during the first 10 decades of life: an autopsy study of 965 normal hearts. Mayo Clin Proc 59:17–20

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Gutt CN, Oniu T, Mehrabi A, Schemmer P, Kashfi A, Kraus T, Büchler MW (2004) Circulatory and respiratory complications of carbon dioxide insufflation. Dig Surg 21:95–105

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

AirSeal InteliFlow insufflation system and cannulas and Stryker PneumoSure insufflation pumps were provided as a donation by Stryker Corporation and Lexion Medical, but these companies did not have any involvement with study design, data analysis, interpretation of results, or decision to publish. No external funding was provided for the study nor to the authors for their work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ciara R. Huntington.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

Dr. Ciara Huntington, Mr. Prince, Ms. Hazelbaker, Mr. Lopes, Mr. Webb, Dr LeMaster, and Dr. Thomas Huntington declare that there are no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose with any products or corporations relevant to this publication.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Huntington, C.R., Prince, J., Hazelbaker, K. et al. Safety first: significant risk of air embolism in laparoscopic gasketless insufflation systems. Surg Endosc 33, 3964–3969 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-06683-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-06683-4

Keywords

Navigation